This past Friday, May 8, the US Labor Dept. released its latest jobless figures. The official report was 20 million more unemployed and an unemployment rate of 14.7%.<\/p>\n
Both mainstream and progressive media reported the numbers: 20 million more jobless and 14.7%. But those numbers, as horrendous as they are, represent a gross under-estimation of the jobless situation in America!<\/p>\n
One might understand why the mainstream media consistently under-reports the jobless. But it is perplexing why so many progressives continue to simply parrot the official figures. Especially when other Labor Dept. data admits the true unemployment rate is 22.4% and the officially total unemployed is 23.1 million.<\/p>\n
Here\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s why the 20 million and 14.7% is a gross under-representation of the magnitude of jobless today:<\/p>\n
Only Half Month Data <\/strong><\/p>\n First, the 20 million for April is really only for data collected until mid-April. Nearly 10 million more jobless workers filed, and received, unemployment benefits after mid-April. And likely millions more jobless have been attempting to get benefits but haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t. Even officially, more 33.5 million have filed for benefits, with several millions more in the pipeline. So the April numbers of jobless\u00e2\u20ac\u201dboth receiving benefits and not yet getting them\u00e2\u20ac\u201dare more than 20 million! An even greater misrepresentation is that the official 20 million unemployed represents only full time workers becoming unemployed. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the figure from the government report that is the category called U-3, or full time workers. There are between 50-60 million more workers who are part time, temp, contract, gig and otherwise \u00e2\u20ac\u02dccontingent\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 workers (i.e. not full time) who are not considered in the 20 million and 14.7%.<\/p>\n Check out the Labor Dept\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own data, in Table A-8, which shows for March and April no fewer than 7.5 million part time workers became unemployed. In April jobless in this group doubled over the previous month, rising by about 5 million in April, according to the Labor Dept.\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own monthly \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcEmployment Situation Report\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. 5 million to 7.5 million represent what\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s called the U-4 government unemployment rate.<\/p>\n But there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s still more. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s what\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s called the U-5 and U-6 unemployed. Who are they? They are what the government calls workers without jobs who are \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmarginally attached\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 to the labor force and workers who are too \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcdiscouraged\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. They are just as \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcjobless\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 as full time and part time workers. But they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re put in another category simply because they haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t actively looked for a job in the most recent four weeks.<\/p>\n You see the US government defines unemployed as that subset of jobless who \u00e2\u20ac\u0153are out of work and actively looking for work\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. If you haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t looked in the last four weeks, you may be jobless but aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t considered unemployed! Go figure. Add them to the U-3 unemployed, and the totals for unemployed in America rise to 22.4%. Add in those who filed for benefits in the last half of April, or tried to, and we get closer to the publicly admitted 33.5 million without jobs and receiving unemployment benefits.<\/p>\n The Disappeared 8 Million Unemployed <\/strong><\/p>\n But that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not even the whole real picture. The way the government defines unemployment a worker must be part of the labor force. The labor force is composed of two groups: those who have jobs and those who are officially unemployed\u00e2\u20ac\u201di.e. out of work and looking for work in past four weeks. If you are not looking, you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmarginally attached\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 (U-5, U-6). It assumes if you have stopped looking in the past four weeks you are part of the 850,000 \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmarginally attached\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. But that figure is not credible. Somehow there are less than a million jobless who simply haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t tried to find a job in the last four weeks? Really? There are many millions.<\/p>\n A government stat that suggests there are likely millions more not in the labor force who are jobless nonetheless is called the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcLabor Force Participation Rate\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. It estimates the percent of the working age population who either have a job or are officially unemployed. The US government doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t consider them unemployed so they don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t show up in the U-3 or even U-6 statistics! But if they aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t in the labor force they are jobless by definition. Perhaps 850,000 are counted as the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmarginally attached\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. But what about the remaining 7.2 million or so? The government has no category for them except the estimation of them in the labor force participation rate. It tries to explain the large number away by saying they retired or went back to school. But did 7.2m (63.4% in Feb. drop to 60.2% in April) retire in 2 months? And they certainly can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have gone back to school in mid-March\/April 2020.<\/p>\n Another government statistic that corroborates this \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcmissing 8 million\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 in the labor force participation rate is called the Employment to Population Ratio stat. It measures how many are in the labor force as a percent of the total US population of nearly 340 million. One possible reason for the discrepancies between the official unemployed of 23.1 million vs. the 33.5 million receiving benefits, or the 7-8 million not being counted per the labor force participation rate and EPOP ratio, may be due to the government in this current crisis choosing not to count as unemployed those workers forced to leave work since February to care for dependents.<\/p>\n Remember the government\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s driving definition of unemployed is the worker must be \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcout of work and actively looking for work\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. Millions of workers who have been forced by the current crisis to leave their job to care for elderly and disabled family members, or to care for young children forced to stay home due to school closures, are not \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcactively looking for work\u00e2\u20ac\u2122. Few Americans can afford nannys to watch their young children so they can work. But those in this situation are not considered unemployed by the US Labor Dept. because they don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t fit the definition of \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcactively looking for work\u00e2\u20ac\u2122! It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not clear how many in this category the Labor Dept. has recently refused to acknowledge as officially unemployed.<\/p>\n In America you may be jobless, but that doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t necessarily mean per the government you are unemployed!<\/p>\n The above stats and data show that the under-reporting of the jobless in the US is not some kind of conspiracy by the Labor dept. and the government. The data are there, buried in the monthly labor reports beyond the executive summaries. The government stats, moreover, are not perfect. There are serious problems related to raw jobs data recovery, to the various assumptions on that raw data the government makes to come up their jobs \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcstatistics\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 (always operations on raw data with assumptions which data to count and how). There are conflicting conclusions often between this or that data or statistic. Furthermore, in recent years changes in statistical processing have sought repeatedly to change definitions and processes in order to \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcsmooth out\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 swings in the statistics\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwhether employment, unemployment, wages, or inflation. The government has a vested interest in ensuring the smoothing. It reduces government (and especially business) costs of programs and operations.<\/p>\n If there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a conspiracy of sorts, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s in the media that purposely seems to always \u00e2\u20ac\u02dccherry pick\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 the most conservative stat to report. Thus we get the media trumpeting every month the nearly worthless statistic of the U-3 unemployment rate\u00e2\u20ac\u201da stat that applies only to full time workers and ignores part time, temp and other contingent labor who make up now nearly a third of the US labor force; a statistic based on a narrow definition of unemployed that has become an oxymoron when estimating unemployed; a statistic based on questionable assumptions and data gathering; and a statistic that can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be reconciled with other statistics like the labor force participate rate.<\/p>\n The real unemployment rate is not the U-3 figure of 14.7% but easily 25% today. And the real total jobless are not the U-3 20 million, or even 23 million, but somewhere between 35-40 million\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 and rising!<\/p>\n However, what\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s really disappointing is that many progressive and left economists simply parrot the government\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s and mainstream media\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s misleading U-3 statistic. One can understand why the corporate mainstream media keep pushing the U-3 stat and thus trying to make the unemployment situation look better than it is (or today not as bad as it is). But progressive economists should know better.<\/p>\n Jack Rasmus is author of the recently published book, \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcThe Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy from Reagan to Trump<\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u2122, Clarity Press, January 2020, and \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcCentral Bankers at the End of Their Ropes: Monetary Policy and the Coming Depression\u00e2\u20ac\u2122<\/strong>, Clarity Press, August 2017. He blogs at jackrasmus.com and his twitter handle is @drjackrasmus. His website is http:\/\/kyklosproductions.com.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Dr. Jack Rasmus
\n
\nOnly Full Time Employed Layoffs<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThere\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s approximately 164.5 million employed\/officially unemployed in the US labor force as of May 1, 2020. In February 2020 the labor force participation rate was 63.4% of the US labor force. As of May 1, that had dropped to only 60.2%. Over the past 12 months, roughly 8 million have dropped out of the labor force. And remember: if they aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t in the labor force they can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be counted as unemployed. So where did the additional 8 million dropping out go?<\/p>\n
\nIf the EPOP percentage goes down, then fewer are working even though they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re obviously still alive and part of the US population. That figure has declined from 61.1% of the US population employed to 51.3% of the population employed as of May 1, 2020. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a nearly 10% drop. 10% of 340 million is about 34 million. And 34 million is not 20 million for April, or even the Labor Dept.\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s total 23.1 million.
\nSo both the labor force participation rate and the employed to population ratio both suggest the Labor Dept.\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s official U-3 (or even U-6) unemployed figures are grossly under-representations of the total Americans without jobs today.
\n
\nVoluntary Jobless Are Not \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcUnemployed\u00e2\u20ac\u2122<\/strong><\/p>\n
\ncopyright 2020
\nThe US media and politicians, and even so-called progressive economists, keep touting the figure of 14.7% unemployment rate in the US by May 1, 2020. Yet 36.5m receiving unemployment benefits by end of April indicate a jobless rate of 22.4%. What\\’s up? Why the official U-3 unemployment rate low-balls the actual jobless (more than even 36.5m since many workers haven\\’t been successful in getting unemployment benefits despite having filed). The following article debunks the official 14.7% peddled by the media and politicians. Here\\’s the various reasons why it is much higher and what\\’s wrong with the official U-3 stat. (As of mid-May the total jobless now around 45 m and a 28% jobless rate).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kyklosproductions.com\/posts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}